![]() |
Sarah Bernhardt |
We’ve all heard about so and so or such and such being “in the limelight,” as in “currently famous/celebrated.” Sounds like an exciting place to be, right (never having been there myself)?
Hate to break it to you, friends, but an examination of the word’s origin tells a different story. It seems that, back in the 1860s and 1870s, actors on theatre stages would be spotlit in a curious way. Thanks to inventor-with-the-coolest name-ever Goldsworthy Gurney, a pipe filled with hydrogen and oxygen would be blown towards a lump of quicklime (calcium oxide). The contact would create a flame that gave off a bright light, “limelight”, and so actors both famous (Sarah Bernhardt) and infamous (John Wilkes Booth) alike were illuminated for their rapt audiences.
Only one little issue, though. The process was extremely dangerous. One can imagine the peril of flames near fabric curtains, wooden stage floors, even the costumes of the day. By the 1890s, limelight had been replaced by electric arc lighting. But the phrase continues to be widely used, perhaps because “Meryl Streep has often been in the electric arc lighting” is a tad clunky.
I was struck by the idea that being in the limelight meant a) being in a dangerous situation AND b) being in something that is extremely fleeting. And there are countless instances of performers whose time in the limelight was fraught with sadness—the child stars whose “stage parents” or agents exploited them, the gifted actors lost to addiction or suicide when the pressures of fame became too great, etc.
We know this, but so many of us seek the limelight anyway. We can handle it, we think. It won’t change who we are deep down. This is true for politicians, as well as singers and dancers. I myself am guilty—I write, not just because I love it, but because I crave even a tiny little bit of renown. Not for me the reclusive scribe life; Emily Dickinson, whose writings were mostly discovered after her death, pops to mind. Poor Em! She could have enjoyed making the late night talk-show rounds! Or how about Keats, Melville, Plath, Orwell, Thoreau? None of them were much recognized in life—were they around today, I’m sure they’d have been just tickled to make the New York Times bestseller list (though it’s unlikely they’d unseat Colleen Hoover). Do I wish I was Colleen Hoover? I think she’s a mediocre writer, and I’m also extremely jealous of her rocket-ship to fortune from her self-published beginnings.
So of COURSE I wish I was Colleen Hoover! It’s all about the limelight! Dangers and brevity are OK by me if I can stand in that bright spot. I have several family members possessing talents that far eclipse mine—an actor/director husband, an artist sister, two composers (son and daughter-in-law). I marvel at their modesty, and wish I too was a fraction as humble.
But not as much as I wish I was Colleen Hoover.
Or Meryl Streep.
Sigh.